Grading System employed

Effective Grading

Either pass or fail.

Qualitative Grading

Grade Definition
31337 Outstanding
1337 Very Good
42 Competent
0 Failed

Method

Graded every month, the ceiled average is the final.

No Quantitative Grading system will be used.

The contributions will be evaluated according to the following directives:

Autonomy with which the work was done

Objectives satisfaction

Intrinsic difficulty level of their work

Grade formula per month

                                Autonomy level
Satisfaction of objectives |    Low     Competent       Very Good       Outstanding
                -----------+-------------------------------------------------------
                Low        |    0       0               0               0
                Competent  |    42      42              42              1337
                Very Good  |    42      1337            1337            31337
                Outstanding|    42      1337            1337            31337

                        Grade from matrix above
Difficulty level   |    0       42              1337    31337
        -----------+-----------------------------------------
        Low        |    0       0               42      1337
        Competent  |    0       42              1337    1337
        Very Good  |    0      1337             1337    1337
        Outstanding|    0      1337             1337    31337

Modules

N.B.: The following are the minimum averages in GNU social's Summer of Code, we will come up with a custom "transcript" for any interested student.

Web Technologies

Amount of time allocated to each module unit

Designation Time (hours)
Autonomous study 80
Mentorship 20
Project work 46
Total 146

Assessment Components

Designation Weight (%)
Proposal 80
Proof of Competence 20

Proposed Credits

1 Carnegie Unit
5 ECTS

Proposal Rating Guidelines


Internship | Training

Amount of time allocated to each module unit

Designation Time (hours)
Internship 276.5
Autonomous Study 93.5
Final Report 24
Mentorship 44
Total 438

Assessment Components

Designation Weight (%)
Practical or project work 100

Proposed Credits

4 Carnegie Unit
18 Austria, Italy, and Spain ECTS
16 Finland, The Netherlands, Portugal, and Russia ECTS
15 Germany, Belgium, Romania, and Hungary ECTS